Why Nader is a Loser

Since I never bothered looking into Ralph Nader, I decided that, what with the upcoming elections and all of the furor over Nader getting on and off of election ballots, I might as well waste a few minutes to find out who he is. Earlier in the elections, I personally was a bigger fan of Dennis Kucinich than any other candidate, but Kucinich dropped out, oh well.

There were two things I wanted to know. 1) Why should anyone even vaguely care about voting for Nader, and 2) is Nader just another corporate whore like everyone else? To answer the first question, a logical place to start was Why Ralph? – his official campaign website

Honestly, I’m still sitting here 10 minutes later trying to figure out why anyone should care about voting for Nader, because his website is so poorly laid out that anyone trying to figure out whether they should vote for him will probably end up voting for Michael Jackson instead. I click on “Why Ralph?” and the ever-so-helpful response is:
# Biography: Peter Miguel Camejo
# Biography: The Independent Citizen for President
# F.A.Q.
# Letters to George W. Bush & John Kerry
# Main Story Archive
# Materials and Writings on the Decision to Run
# Ralph’s Writings
# Testimonials & Letters

This is just fucking stupid. None of this tells me why anyone would care if Ralph won. So he has a biography there, and some Camejo idiot who is going to be his running bitc….er…mate has a bio too. Camejo who? I don’t give a fuck about Camejo; I want to know about Nader. I’m guessing it’s gonna be in the FAQ, but frankly, Nader has already lost my attention. I don’t care whether or not Nader writes letters to his lovers Bush and Kerry, I would rather decapitate myself with a sytrofoam cup than read any stories he wrote, and the last time I heard a testimony was in the Pentecostal church my parents dragged me to as a kid. The last thing that is gonna help me make important political decisions is the rabid, foaming testimony of some Nader fanboy.

But in the interest of fairness, I decide to click on the FAQ, hoping to get some enlightenment about why anybody should vote Nader. Finally, something potentially useful: “To take our democracy back from the corporate interests that dominate both parties. Ralph is running, as all third-party and Independent candidates do, to mobilize citizens behind an issues agenda — a fundamental solution revolution — for the American people that neither major party will discuss or adopt.”

Okay, my bullshit alarm went off, and the pungent fumes are starting to make my eyes water. Let’s translate these sentences into plain English by filling in the blanks. “To take our democracy [otherwise known as a nascent police fascist empire] back from the corporate interests [other than the ones I own stock in – this, by the way, answers point #2] that dominate both parties [because they won’t let me come to their parties, those bastards]. Ralph is running [like Forest Gump], as all third-party and Independent candidates do [see why I said Forest Gump? The evil Republican and Democratic bullies want to knock the poor invalids over, those slutty corporate whores!], to mobilize citizens behind an issues agenda – a fundamental solution revolution [WTF?!] – for the American people [oh no, it isn’t for Nader] that neither major party will discuss or adopt.”

A “fundamental solution revolution” – that just makes my mouth hang open dripping drool over my chest with its rhythmic brilliance! Now I can finally understand why to vote for Nader. If Nader wins, we will live in a land of horrible rhetoric that will cause world peace by killing everyone via the noxious fumes that ooze steaming from his campaign writers’ pens. Just think, everyone dead and nobody left to screw the world up.

So, why is Nader going to lose the election? First of all, he’s so boring that I’d rather vote for the first geriatric patient with a stroke I can find, since that is guaranteed to be more interesting. Secondly, he’s going to lose because nobody can figure out why the hell they should give a fuck about him and his campaign. Third, and finally, he’s going to lose because he’s named after that stupid kid on the Simpsons who is always picking his nose, and nobody in Washington wants to deal with that on government paperwork after four years of having to spray air freshener on everything Bush touched.

One thought on “Why Nader is a Loser”

  1. In my observation of the Democratic National Convention earlier this year, Dennis Kucinich portrayed the larger part of what is the barrier to political change in the United States today. He announced on the eve of John Kerry’s nomination that he was throwing his support behind John F. Kerry, to bring the party into tighter unity. (Behind the eminent nomination) Be it right or not, the Republican Party, by all appearances, has been able to quell the broadcast bickering that the Democrats have been unable to. This isn’t to say that either party is better; as the Republican Party by popular report has been responsible for getting Ralph Nader on the ballot, not for broadening the choice for the American public, but to muddy the waters and broaden the (perceived) gap between Kerry and Bush in the upcoming elections.

    Nader, much on the same level as John Kerry is unable to project his plan above the rhetoric of corporate evils. (Or for ‘JFK’ – Vietnam) In my mind the focus could be more on the bureaucratic evils, e.g., USPTO.

    Even as recently as this March, Nader not only conceded that he wanted to meet with Kerry to ‘have a common objective’ in defeating the ‘giant corporation residing in the White House’. Nader then moves onto Atlanta where he states that he is considering running under the Reform Party ticket (AKA – the party that Ross Perot ran for) in an attempt to “collaborate and not waste too many resources”. (Although, not on a national level, of course).

    It’s obvious to me that what plagues Nader seems to be the same malaise in which John Kerry finds so comfortable, and that is the inability to come up with a strong enough agenda for the American public to decide on. Kerry seems to be trying to carry the banner of a centrist that so many people liked Clinton for. But he champions that banner about as well as Mary Carey for governor of California.

    So if perceptions are correct, nation divided, hope for a party divided. It kind of makes the potential for change seem very unlikely, whoever wins this election.

    IMHO of course!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *